Leave The Conclusion, Prabowo-Gibran Ledek Gugatan Anies-Ganjar

Prabowo-Gibran's legal team at the Constitutional Court Building, Jakarta, Tuesday, April 16. (Rizky A-VOI)

JAKARTA - The Prabowo-Gibran camp assessed that Anies-Cak Imin and Ganjar-Mahfud's lawsuits were not appropriate to be submitted to the Constitious Court (MK). Supposedly, the arguments for the problem should be more about the vote in the 2024 presidential election.

This was conveyed by a member of the Prabowo-Gibran Legal Team, Otto Hasibuan, after submitting a conclusion document related to the dispute over General Election Results (PHPU) dispute to the Constitutional Court Registrar.

"What must be questioned according to the law of the event is the results of the votes obtained by each candidate pair," Otto told reporters at the Constitutional Court Building, Jakarta, Tuesday, April 16.

"So actually according to the law of the event, what must be said in question is how much sound is actually obtained by 03 and 01 and which is the voice of the KPU whose calculation is not true, that is actually this case," he continued.

The lawsuit from Anies-Cak Imin and Ganjar-Mahfud is considered not to be included in the subject matter of the case. The two applicants argued about the alleged fraud.

"They entered the arena that they did not question and did not want to know the existing procedural law that had been regulated in the Election Law, namely that they had to count votes, they entered by saying we filed a lawsuit not with the PHPU, we filed a lawsuit on the basis of fraud allegedly committed by 02 so they applied for disqualification," he explained.

In addition, another member of the Prabowo-Gibran Legal Team, Fahri Bachmid, said that in the conclusion file there were no new facts presented. This is because during the trial no new information was revealed regarding the petitioners' lawsuits.

"So there is no new analysis, there are no new facts or we try to incorporate manipulative evidence that in essence has never been examined by the constitutional court," said Fahri.