JAKARTA - Indonesia Calling (IM) 57+ Institute suspects that maladministration really occurred when the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) removed Brigadier General Endar Priantoro as Director of Investigation. This allegation strengthens because the institution does not fulfill the call of the Indonesian Ombudsman.
"KPK's actions to refuse cooperation in this case are actually further confirming the suspicion that maladministration and arbitrary actions have indeed occurred in the process of dismissing Brigadier General Endar Priantoro from the KPK," said IM57+ Institute Chair Praswad Nugraha to reporters, Wednesday, May 31.
Praswad said that the KPK seemed to choose to answer the Ombudsman's summons without any intention of clarifying. Firli Bahuri as the KPK leader and the reported party are also considered not to comply with the law.
Moreover, the anti-corruption commission seemed to question the authority of the Ombudsman when responding to the summons of the institution. "Even though the Ombudsman is carrying out its duties, functions and authorities," said the former KPK employee.
According to Praswad, the Ombudsman clearly carried out his work in accordance with Law Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman. This then became an example of how Firli Bahuri et al acted carelessly.
"Instead of answering substantially, the KPK prefers to answer without the direction of verification of the truth," he said.
"We consider that the refusal by the KPK related to the examination of cases of alleged maladministration in the dismissal of Brigadier General Endar Priantoro from the KPK is a form of repetition so many times that the KPK leadership and their devices do not comply with the law," continued Praswad.
The Indonesian Ombudsman previously assessed that the KPK was uncooperative when asked for information on the alleged maladministration of the removal of Brigadier General Endar Priantoro as Director of Investigation. In fact, this institution has sent letters twice addressed to KPK Chairman Firli Bahuri and KPK Secretary General Cahya H. Harefa.
"Instead of getting answers and coming to the Ombudsman, on May 22, we received a letter which contained no clarification on the questions we submitted, but related to a number of things that made us at the Ombudsman this shocking," said RI Ombudsman Member Robert Na Endi Jaweng at the Ombudsman Office. RI, South Jakarta, Tuesday, May 30.
This surprise arose because the letter actually questioned the authority of the Ombudsman. Robert regretted the answer because they had actually given the KPK time.
Meanwhile, the KPK felt that the Ombudsman could not deal with the issue of Endar's dismissal. The reason is that the process is not in the realm of public services.
The anti-corruption commission said that the recruitment process and dismissal were internal matters. Moreover, Endar's tenure as Director of Investigation was completed so he was returned to the Police.
SEE ALSO:
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)