Not Many Responses To Anwar Usman Who Was Removed, Ganjar Pranowo Left The Assessment To The Public

Bacawapres Ganjar Pranowo (Photo: 1st)

JAKARTA - Candidate for president (candidate) Ganjar Pranowo respects but does not want to talk much about the decision of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court (MKMK) which removed Anwar Usman as Chairman of the Constitutional Court. Ganjar said let the people give the assessment. "It has been decided so I respect the MKMK's decision and the public all have the right to judge," Ganjar told reporters in Jakarta, Wednesday, November 8. The same thing was conveyed in response to the decision on the age requirements for presidential candidates (candidates) and vice presidential candidates (cawapres) which were not canceled. It is known that Anwar knocked on the decision and made his nephew, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, move forward to accompany Prabowo Subianto in the 2024 presidential election. “ Everything is welcome to assess individually the processes that occur there. We hope that tomorrow's democracy will be better, ” said the former Governor of Central Java. As previously reported, the Constitutional Court imposed sanctions in the form of dismissal of Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court Anwar Usman from his position. He was declared to have violated the code of ethics and behavior in deciding the case of the presidential and vice presidential age limit. MKMK in the decision No.2/MKMK/L/10/2023 said Anwar was proven to have violated the Code of Ethics and Conduct of Constitutional Justices as stated in the Sapta Karsa Hutama. "Imposing sanctions for dismissal from the position of Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court to the Reported Judge," said Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court Jimly Asshiddiqie while reading the verdict at the Constitutional Court Building, Central Jakarta, Tuesday, November 7.

One of the conclusions of the MKMK called Anwar Usman was proven to have deliberately opened up the space for outside intervention in the process of taking the 90/PUU-XXI/2023 decision, thus violating the Sapta Karsa Hutama, the Independence Principle, the Implementation of the Numbers 1, 2, and 3. In addition, he was proven to have violated the principles of impartiality, the principle of integrity, the principle of competence and equality, and the principle of independence.