JAKARTA - The divorce trial of Inara Rusli and Virgoun with the evidentiary agenda must be postponed until next week. Inara Rusli is scheduled to present written evidence in the trial, but Inara herself does not appear to be present at the West Jakarta Religious Court (PA).
Arjana Bagaskara as Inara Rusli's attorney said that his party had prepared 52 written evidence to be disclosed in the trial next week. He admitted that he already had evidence in original form that would surprise the public.
"We want to give you a surprise. But it was postponed, so just wait until we convey it at the trial," said Arjana Bagaskara when met at the West Jakarta PA on Tuesday, July 18.
Regarding evidence of vulgar chat from Virgoun which was used by Inara as evidence in another case at Polda Metro Jaya last week, Arjana stated that there is a possibility that the vulgar chat will be presented again in the divorce trial.
Arjana said that the legal team would ask Inara further about the evidence of the vulgar chat, before it was actually revealed in front of the West Jakarta PA panel of judges.
"Regarding this (vulgar chat), we have thought about it. Later we will ask Mrs. Inara again, whether it will be a part with this written evidence or not," said Arjana.
The lawyer for Inara Rusli said that evidence of vulgar chat would be presented if he supported the client's lawsuit to get custody of his three children.
"Even if it does (provide evidence of vulgar chat), it must be to strengthen child custody so that it is given to Ibu Inara," he said.
According to the lawyer, minors still need a role model. With the evidence of this vulgar message, he believes that the panel of judges will grant his client's claim on child custody.
SEE ALSO:
"This is related to coaching and figures for their children. We also think that for a while Mr. Virgoun needs time to be related to other things," said Arjana.
Furthermore, Arjana believes that child custody will fall to her client. He assessed that the age of the three children of Inara and Virgoun who are still under 12 years old is the main point of the legal aspect.
"Yes, it would be nice if the panel of judges also saw with wisdom that the child custody was precisely for Mrs. Inara. Especially at the age of under 12 years," concluded Arjana Bagaskara, Inara Rusli's attorney.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
