أنشرها:

JAKARTA - Spokesperson for the Judicial Commission, Miko Ginting, said the chairman and panel of judges at the Central Jakarta District Court (PN Jakpus) did not attend the summons of the Judicial Commission at the scheduled time. "Both the chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court and the panel of judges did not attend the summons according to the scheduled time," said Miko Ginting when confirmed by ANTARA from Jakarta, Tuesday, May 30. The Judicial Commission has made legal and appropriate summons to the chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court and the panel of judges who examined and decided the case of the People's Fair and Prosperous Party (Prima) against the General Election Commission (KPU). Due to the absence of the chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court and the panel of judges, Miko said that his party would call back the related parties. The Judicial Commission hopes that the parties can fulfill the summons because the ethics forum at the Judicial Commission is useful for the parties to provide a complete explanation of this public report. " “ once again, this summons was made based on public reports regarding alleged ethical violations and behavior of judges, in which the Judicial Commission has the authority to do so," he said. Previously, the Central Jakarta District Court granted the Prima Party's lawsuit against the KPU not to carry out the remaining stages of the 2024 General Election and carry out the election stages from the beginning for approximately two years and four months and seven days. "Punishing the defendant (KPU) not to carry out the remaining stages of the 2024 General Election since this decision was pronounced and carrying out the general election stage from the beginning for approximately two years and four months and seven days," said the Central Jakarta District Court Judges chaired by Oyong, as quoted from decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Pst, when accessed in Jakarta, Thursday (2/3). The consideration of the panel of judges in the decision is to restore and create a fair condition and protect so that as early as possible other incidents due to inaccuracies, inaccuracies, unprofessionalism, and injustice by the defendant, in this case the KPU.
In addition, the panel of judges also stated that legal facts had proven that there was a condition of error in the Political Party Information System (Sipol) which was caused by the quality factor of the tools used or factors outside the infrastructure.

The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)