Human Rights Affairs In The Presidential Candidate Debate Are Still Being Discussed By TPN, Prabowo's Commitment Is Questioned

Spokesperson For The National Winning Team (TPN) Ganjar-Mahfud, Gifari Shadad/PHOTO: Abdul Aziz Masindo-VOI

JAKARTA - The Ganjar-Mahfud National Winning Team (TPN) responded to Prabowo's words which called Ganjar tendentsius regarding human rights handling and appointed Mahfud MD during the presidential candidate debate.

According to TPN spokesman Ganjar-Mahfud Gifari Shadad, Ganjar's goal in asking about the handling of human rights is to ask the commitment of presidential candidate number 2 Prabowo if he is elected president.

"I think Prabowo said that in fact, he also doesn't have to focus on Mr. Mahfud, because what he asked was actually Mr. Ganjar asking about his commitment when he was president," said Gifari.

Gifari also regretted that Prabowo threw the statement at Mahfud MD. Even though TPN wants to know what the settlement process will be if Prabowo is elected in the presidential election.

"He wants to make a human rights court or not, but instead he throws it at others, like that, even though we want to see his response, it should be if a leader has a problem that must be resolved," he said.

In the presidential candidate debate, last Tuesday, December 12, Prabowo Subianto's presidential candidate assessed that Ganjar Pranowo's question was tendentious regarding past human rights violations.

"Well, how come I say I'm not firm? I will firmly uphold human rights. The problem you ask is a bit tendentious," said Prabowo.

Prabowo also mentioned that the 13 missing people who took care of this problem were Deputy Ganjar, namely Mahfud MD when he served as Chairman of the Constitutional Court.

"Why was it asked me when 13 people were missing? That's tendentious, sir. And the deputy father who took care of this so far. So, if the decision is to hold a human rights court, we hold a human rights court, there is no problem," said Prabowo.