Prosecutors Consider Mario Dandy Creates Lies To Turn Facts Around, Ask Judges To Sentence 12 Years

Mario Dandy at the South Jakarta District Court while listening to the Public Prosecutor reading the demands (Capture the Kompas TV screen)

JAKARTA - The Public Prosecutor (JPU) asked the panel of judges to reject the memorandum of defense or plea from the defendant Mario Dandy Satroyo and his attorney. Then, handed down the verdict in accordance with the statement, namely 12 years in prison. "The public prosecutor appealed to the panel of judges who examined and tried this case to, reject all pleas from the legal advisory team of the defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo, handed down the verdict as stated in the indictment of the public prosecutor's demands which had been read out," said the prosecutor at the trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Thursday, 24 August. The request was made because the prosecutor assessed that all the arguments from the defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo and his attorneys contained in the plea were only a few pieces or pieces of the series of events. Moreover, in this case, David Ozora as a victim must get justice by prioritizing morality, human values, the value of justice and the value of truth. "The information in the plea does not describe the facts that actually happened," he said. In fact, the prosecutor emphasized that if all the evidence, witness statements and experts are assembled into a series of stories, then all the pleas from the defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo and his attorney will be disputed. In a series of complete facts, it is described that Mario Dandy has a clear role or involvement ranging from planning to persecution of David Ozora. "By using a series of facts in its entirety, it will be seen that a fact that is contrary to what was stated by either the legal advisory team or the defendant in their plea which clearly describes the defendant's involvement as a perpetrator in a criminal act, participating in severe persecution with the plan first," said the prosecutor. In addition, the prosecutor also considered the defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo to create a series of lies in the case of alleged severe abuse of David Ozora. The goal is to build an alibi so that it is free from legal snares. "The defendant Mario Dandy also created a series of lies to build an alibi to escape the snares of the law," he said. The lie that Mario Dandy told was actually an entry point for the police at the investigation level to determine him as a suspect. Even at the trial stage. All the lies are clearly visible when viewed objectively. "From this series of trials, we can objectively assess that the defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo is increasingly cornered by his own lies which can eventually be used as an indication of the defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo's mistake in the persecution he committed against David Ozora," said the prosecutor. Mario Dandy Satriyo was charged with imprisonment for 12 years. This is because Mario is considered legally proven and convincingly guilty in the case of alleged severe abuse against David Ozora.

In addition, Rafael Alun Trisambodo's son is burdened with paying restitution of Rp120 billion. If Mario is unable to pay, then, there is an additional penalty in the form of imprisonment for 7 years