The National Police also imposed sanctions for dismissal or dishonorable dismissal (PTDH) against Bripka IG who had been named a suspect in the police shooting case.
Another suspect, Bripda IMS, has also been sentenced to dismissal.
"Administrative sanctions in the form of dishonorable dismissal as a member of the National Police," said Karo Penmas, Police Public Relations Division, Brigadier General Ahmad Ramadhan in his statement, Friday, August 4.
The decision to dismiss Bripka IG was based on the results of the Police Code of Ethics Commission (KKEP) trial which took place on Friday, August 4. He is considered to have violated the rules for storing homemade firearms.
Brigadier IG's actions were deemed to have violated Article 13 paragraph (1) of PP Number 1 of 2003 concerning the Dismissal of Police Members in conjunction with Article 5 paragraph (1) letter b, Article 8 letter c number 1, Article 10 paragraph (1) letter a number 5, Article 10 paragraph (1) letter f, Article 10 paragraph (1) letter a number 5 in conjunction with Article 10 paragraph (6) letter a and letter b Perpol Number 7 of 2022 concerning the Professional Code of Ethics and the Police Code of Ethics Commission.
"Bripka IGP has controlled or stored components of firearms and firearms obtained illegally for assembled and sold, traded and abused firearms obtained illegally," said Ramadhan.
However, Bripka IG did not immediately accept the decision of the KKEP trial. He filed an appeal.
"Violators declare an appeal," said Ramadhan.
SEE ALSO:
The police shooting police case killed Bripda Ignatius Dwi Frisco Sirage. The incident occurred at the Police Flats, Bogor, on Sunday, July 23.
From the results of the investigation, Bripda IMS and Bripka IG were found guilty and named suspects.
In the criminal process, Bripda IMS is suspected of under Article 338 and/or 359 of the Criminal Code and/or the Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951.
Meanwhile, Brigadier IG is subject to Article 338 in conjunction with 56 and or 359 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with 56 of the Criminal Code and or the Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951.
In addition, they are considered to have violated the code of ethics. Both were sanctioned by special placements (patsus) in the Propam Division.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)