Lawyers For Dismissing Domestic Violence Issues And Third Persons Are The Reason For Nisya Ahmad To Sue Andika Rosadi's Divorce

JAKARTA - Andika Rosadi's attorney, Nata Sasmita, dismissed issues related to domestic violence and also third person in the middle of his client's household relationship with Nisya Ahmad.

Nata explained that the dispute between Andika and Nisya became common in the household to see the age of Nisya and Andika as young.

"When it comes to disputes because they are still young from the pattern of life from there," said Nita Sasmita at the South Jakarta Religious Court, Thursday, August 1.

Then related to third parties, Nata was reluctant to talk much because Nisya or Andika had not provided any evidence related to it at trial.

"Meanwhile, this dispute is just a normal thing. It has not been revealed whether it is true that the third party or others," explained Nata Sasmita.

Likewise with the issue of violence that occurred in Raffi Ahmad's younger brother Nata's household, Nata also admitted that there was no evidence of any evidence by the two parties.

"KDRT cannot be addressed, for now there is no proof," he explained.

Even though they have filed for divorce, both Nisya and Andika still live in the same house and are united in raising their three children. "Meanwhile, they are still under joint custody, there are no demands for child custody," he said.