Melok-lok Mahfud In Debate Cawapres Last Night, PPP: He's A Professor, Gibran Doesn't Have Ethics

Spokesperson for the National Winning Team (TPN) Ganjar-Mahfud as well as the Chairperson of the PPP DPP Achmad Baidowi (Nailin/VOI)

JAKARTA - The chairman of the PPP DPP, Achmad Baidowi, highlighted the fun to make fun of the emergent Cawapres number 2, Gibran Rakabuming Raka in his fourth debate last night, especially when responding to the answer to Vice Presidential Decree number 3, Mahfud MD. Gibran was judged to be like a leader candidate who had no ethics. "Last night we were shown a debate, which was what quality debate was, and how quality debate was. Ethical debate and which was unethical debate," Awiek told reporters, Monday, January 22. According to Awiek, Gibran's intellectual aura immediately disappeared when he issued a gesture that seemed to be holding up because he couldn't find an answer from Mahfud. "It's better if the debate was more about the basic device than playing with the niche terms. Apart from young people, it must also uphold ethics, because there is ethics in the debate," explained the spokesman for the Ganjar-Mahfud National Winning Team (TPN) Ganjar-Mahfud. "In our daily politics because sometimes our intelligence, our intelligence, sometimes our ability is lost because we don't have the attitude or our lack of attitude," he continued.

If another pair of candidates gives a gimmick, said Awiek, it would not be wrong if Mahfud replied with the same thing. Moreover, according to him, Gibran's explanation about green inflation is also not appropriate. "Mr. Mahfud is a professor of legal science, constitutional law, so if there is a language that seems to underestimate personally and digimically, yes, Mr. Mahfud replied with a gimmick because what was conveyed, what Mas Gibran said was not in accordance with his meaning," said Awiek.