Mario Dandy Did Not File An Exception, The Reason Was That The Indictment Was Made From His Statement

Shane Lukas and Mario Dandy (right), 2 defendants in the case of severe abuse against David Ozora underwent their first trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday, June 6. (Rizky A-VOI)

JAKARTA - The defendant Mario Dandy Satrio decided not to file a memorandum of objection or exception on charges from the public prosecutor (JPU) in the case of alleged severe abuse against David Ozora. The reason is that most of the charges were made based on his statement.

"Earlier we did not carry out the exception, it was conveyed. Before the trial we had conveyed that we would not carry out any exceptions," said Mario Dandy Satrio's lawyer, Andreas Nahot Silitonga, to reporters, Tuesday, June 6.

The indictment read by the prosecutor is considered to be very complete and detailed. Thus, there is no need and there is no reason to be questioned.

Moreover, the very detailed indictment was claimed to be large based on Mario Dandy's statement.

"What I need to emphasize here is how the indictment can be very detailed, because the results of the police investigation and Mario Dandy's cooperative nature are also," said Andreas.

"We heard earlier, yes, all his words have been stated in the minutes. Who can know, the police can know whether the incident happened or not, the details of the words? You can't, only Mario Dandy and the people there," he continued.

In this case, Mario Dandy Satriyo was charged with committing severe abuse against David Ozora. In fact, the act of persecution was planned.

Thus, Mario Dandy's actions are considered to have violated Article 355 of the Criminal Code paragraph 1 subsidiary Article 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code subsidiary 535 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Then, Article 76c Jo 80 of the Child Protection Law.