Tomorrow, Mario Dandy-Shane Lukas Will Listen To Prosecutors' Demands Regarding Persecution David Ozora

JAKARTA - The South Jakarta District Court will hold a follow-up hearing in the case of alleged severe abuse against David Ozora, on Tuesday, August 15. The agenda is the reading of demands for the defendants Mario Dandy Satrio and Shane Lukas. "Tuesday 15 August, the trial will be held again with an agenda for reading criminal charges," said the Public Relations Officer of the South Jakarta District Court, Djiyamto in his statement, Monday, August 14. Originally, the trial reading of the charges was planned to be held last week. However, for one reason or another, the panel of judges who tried the case decided to postpone it. The Public Prosecutor at the South Jakarta District Court revealed the reason for delaying the prosecution because it took more time to perfect the demands. "It is true that today we read out the demands but because we are still making improvements to our demands asking for time until next Wednesday (Tuesday) next week. Today is not ready because there are still improvements," said prosecutor. David Ozora's father, Jonathan Latumahina admitted that he was very disappointed with the cancellation of the trial of the demands of the two defendants. "The one who must have been disappointed. Because a few minutes ago when asked by friends, the trial of the case was too long. Yesterday we know today the demands from TikTok from public relations. Well, it turns out that the prosecutors are not ready," said Jonathan. Jonathan. Jonathan said, there was indeed a slight amount related to the cancellation of the trial of the prosecution. The reason when he arrived at the court, he did not find a legal representative who accompanied the defendant. In particular, the attorneys were always complete to accompany Mario and Shane Lukas. "This is the law in this country if it is not controlled, yes," said Jonathan.

In this case, the defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo was charged with Article 355 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary to Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code and or Article 76c in conjunction with Article 50 paragraph 2 of Law number 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code. Meanwhile, the articles imposed on Defendant Shane Lukas are Article 355 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code subsidiary Article 355 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code, and or Article 355 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 56 of the 2nd Criminal Code subsidiary Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 56 paragraph 2 of the 2 of the Criminal Code, and or Article 76c in conjunction with Article 50 paragraph 2 of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection in conjunction with Article 56 of the 2 of the Criminal Code.