Former Commissioner Of PT Wika Beton Sued 11 Years 5 Months In Case Of Bribery In Case Management In MA

Former Commissioner of PT Wika Beton Dadan Tri Yudianto at the trial of the alleged bribery case management at the Supreme Court (MA). (Between)

JAKARTA - The prosecutor demanded that former Commissioner of PT Wika Beton Dadan Tri Yudianto be sentenced to 11 years and 5 months in the case of alleged bribery in case management at the Supreme Court (MA).

"Sentenced the defendant Dadan Tri Yudianto to imprisonment for 11 years and 5 months," said KPK prosecutor Wawan Yunarwanto during a trial at the Corruption Court at the Central Jakarta District Court (PN), Jakarta, Tuesday, February 13, which was confiscated by Antara.

Dadan was also charged with a fine of Rp. 1 billion, subsidiary to imprisonment for 6 months. In addition, he was also sentenced to additional criminal charges in the form of payment of replacement money in the amount of Rp. 7,950,000,000, subsidiary to 3 years in prison.

The KPK prosecutor stated that Dadan was legally and convincingly proven to have committed a criminal act of corruption as charged. In this case, the defendant is said to have been proven to have received a total of Rp11,200,000,000 along with Hasbi Hasan, who was the secretary of the Supreme Court at that time.

The money was received from the debtor of the Intidana Heryanto Tanaka Savings and Loans Cooperative (KSP), who at that time was in a case at the Supreme Court. The money is to include disclosing the management of the case in the Supreme Court so that it is decided according to Heryanto Tanaka's wishes.

Therefore, the KPK prosecutor believes Dadan violated Article 12 letter a jo. Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code jo. Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.

"The defendant's actions did not support the government's program in eradicating corruption, the defendant's actions damaged public trust in the Indonesian Supreme Court," said the prosecutor reading out the aggravating things.

Another burdensome thing is that the defendant is considered convoluted in giving information and the defendant is believed to be the person who wants the benefits of a criminal act. Meanwhile, the mitigating thing is that the defendant has never been convicted.