David Ozora's Father Reveals The Surprising Thing About AG Perpetrators: Lying About Sexual Harassment

Reconstruction of the case of persecution of David (Photo: Rizky AP/VOI)

JAKARTA - David Ozora's father, Jonathan Latumahina, exposed the surprising things of the child perpetrator, AG (15), who was sued for four years for involvement in severe abuse. One of the considerations of the prosecutor demanding that AG be declared lying about sexual harassment. This statement was made by Jonathan in response to a tweet from one of the netizens with the @dawiguna account. "1 of the 10 elements that proved AG's involvement and became the basis for the prosecutor's demands was "Lie about the issue of sexual harassment" In full there was @MellisA_An (Day's attorney, Melisa Anggriani)," Jonathan tweeted, quoted by VOI, Thursday, April 6. The @dawiguna account previously stated that AG's four-year demands were more prone to revenge, forcing AG to be subject to maximum punishment. The tweet reads: "WHAT CAN BE SEEN IS DENDAM, AND forcing AG TO BE subject to maximum punishment. Even though she is a young woman and seems to have become a SEX object, including David's alleged sexual harassment. Involved, huh. Become the main actor? No, So mastermind? Not proven," tweeted the @dawuna account quoted by VOI. Jonathan emphasized that the statement that AG is an attraction of sex is also baseless. The reason is, the person concerned after breaking up with David still sends photos and expresses his longing. "Kog sex objects often send photos to my parents and talk about missing even though they have broken up, and he admitted it at trial. Wait for Mario's trial tomorrow, yes, the trial is open. Ready to account for your words, sir. Don't be destroyed," said Jonathan. AG (15), the perpetrator of the child in the case of severe abuse against David Ozora, was charged with four years. AG is subject to Article 355 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.

It reads, (1) Serious torture carried out with a plan first, is threatened with a maximum imprisonment of twelve years. (2) If the act results in death, the guilty one is threatened with a maximum imprisonment of fifteen years.