Not Directly Ordered By Ferdy Sambo, Baiquni Ogah Kubu Equated With Ricky Rizal
The defendant Baiquni Wibowo's camp is reluctant to be equated with Ricky Rizal Wibowo alias Bripka RR regarding the condition of the order of the superior in the series of cases of the death of Yosua alias Brigadier J.The Baiquni camp made this statement when reading the duplicate to respond to the public prosecutor's replica (JPU)."The defendant Baiquni Wibowo in the replica was paired with the conditions and situation with Ricky Rizal regarding how to refuse orders from superiors," Baiquni's legal advisory team said during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Wednesday, February 8.The reason was, in this series of incidents, Baiquni never received direct orders from Ferdy Sambo. But, it's different from Ricky Rizal.Moreover, Baiquni copied and deleted the CCTV footage file based on the defendant's request, Chuck Putranto, without knowing his purpose and purpose."Regarding the order of the indirect superior, the defendant Baiquni never received orders directly from Ferdy Sambo but always through witness Chuck Putranto and witness Arif. Meanwhile, Ricky Rizal received direct orders from Ferdy Sambo," he said.In addition, Baiquni's actions copied the data without knowing the contents of the CCTV DVR."Because witness Chuck immediately gave a CCTV DVR without giving an explanation to Baiquni Wibowo," said Baiquni's legal advisory team.Baiquni Wibowo is said to be involved in the obstruction to the investigation into the death of Brigadier J. This is because he is trying to eliminate evidence of the CCTV DVR of the Police Complex security post, Duren Tiga.In fact, the CCTV DVR is proof of the key to uncovering the scenario made by Ferdy Sambo. This is because keeping the recording of Brigadier J's seconds is still alive before the former Head of the Propam Police Division arrives at his official residenceFor the defendant Baiquni Wibowo, he played a role in copying and deleting the footage on CCTV DVR. So, with that role he was sentenced to 2 years in prison and a fine of Rp. 10 million.This is because Baiquni Wibowo is believed to have violated Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code.