2016 Election: Donald Trump's Campaign And His Campaign's 2016 Presidential Campaign

ILLUSTRATION/BETWEEN

JAKARTA - The Honorary Board of Election Organizers (DKPP) decided the results of the examination of alleged violations of the Code of Conduct of Election Organizers (KEPP) complained by South Kalimantan cagub Denny Indrayana.

South Kalimantan Cagub (Kalsel) Denny Indrayana complained to Bawaslu Kalsel through the legal authority of Muhamad Raziv Barokah. Denny Indrayana complained to Erna Kasypiah, Iwan Setiawan, Aries Mardiono, Azhar Ridhanie, and Nur Kholis Majid (Chairman and Member of Bawaslu South Kalimantan) as Teradu I to V.

"The Honorary Board of Election Organizers concludes that: The Honorary Board of Election Organizers is authorized to adjudicate the Complainant's complaint; The complainant has a legal standing to file a complaint a quo;  Teradu I, Teradu II, Teradu III, Teradu IV, and Teradu V were proven to have violated the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Election Organizers," the DECISION of the DKPP was quoted by VOI, Thursday, May 20.

DKPP decided to impose warning sanctions on Teradu I Erna Kasypiah as Chairman concurrently Member bawaslu South Kalimantan Province, Teradu II Iwan Setiawan, Teradu III Aries Mardiono, Teradu IV Azhar Ridhanie, Teradu V Nur Kholis Majid each as a Member Bawaslu South Kalimantan Province.

"Ordering the Election Supervisory Board to carry out this decision no later than 7 (seven) days after the Verdict is read; and Ordered the Election Supervisory Board to supervise the implementation of this ruling," continued the dkpp decision passage.

Previously Denny Indrayana in his lawsuit complained that defendant I until V postulated acting unprofessionally and unseated in following up the report number 03/PL/PG/Prov/22.00/XI/2020 related to alleged election violations committed by paslon cagub Kalsel number 1 on behalf of H. Sahbirin Noor as incumbent. Alleged violations reported are related to the politicization of COVID-19 foodstuffs.

Complainant Denny Indrayana also postulated there was a fatal error of review on the report number 03/PL/PG/Prov/22.00/XI/2020 conducted by Teradu I to V. There was a discrepancy between the analysis results and the conclusions in the study. And the results of the study were not submitted to the Complainant.

The evidence of the last complaint is that Teradu did not accommodate the Complainant's request to provide news of the clarification of the Complainant's witnesses.