Nora Still Seeking Justice Because Jerinx Becomes A Victim Of The ITE Law, Legal Counsel Hand Over Counter Memorandum Of Cassation

Jerinx with his wife Nora Alexandra (DOK.Instagram Jerinx)

DENPASAR - Nora Alexandra is still looking for justice for I Gede Ary Astina alias Jerinx SID who is said to be a victim of the ITE Law. Meanwhile, Jerinx SID's legal process is currently in the cassation stage.

"Why only now sir? Then what happened to my husband @jrxsid? He had apologized many times before being made a defendant. Lots of evidence. IDI Pusat (victim) has repeatedly stated that they DO NOT WANT TO JAMILY my husband. The Chairman of IDI BALI (NOT A VICTIM) also stated the same thing. Why is my husband still being detained, sir? Please respond @divisihumaspolri, "said Nora via Instagram account ncdpapl, Tuesday, February 23.

Meanwhile, Jerinx's legal advisor team today visited the Denpasar District Court. They submitted a counter appeal memorandum on the cassation memory of the public prosecutor.

The counter-cassation memorandum from the legal advisor team of Jerinx was immediately received by the court clerk at the Denpasar District Court.

Legal Counselor Coordinator, Wayan 'Gendo' Suardana, explained that the counter appeal memory contains points of response to the prosecutor's appeal memory.

"As we said earlier, the prosecutors' cassation memory was forced," said Gendo in a written statement.

In the appeal memory, the prosecutor presented by Jerinx's lawyer stated that the judge's verdict was too light for Jerinx. For Jerinx's lawyer, the reason the prosecutor was against the law and the law was because the severity of the punishment was not the authority of the cassation, but the authority of the judex factie and had been strengthened by the Supreme Court Jurisprudence Number 797 K / Pid / 1983 and the law from M. Yahya Harahap.

So the reason for the cassation of the prosecutor to measure the severity of the sentence, according to Jerinx's lawyer, is contrary to Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

"That reason should be rejected," he added.

Gendo also said that the reasons for the prosecutor's memory were repetition of facts that were not under the authority of the cassation and had been accommodated in the appeal judge's decision.

In addition, in his cassation memory, the prosecutor stated that the judge had wrongly applied the evidence.

"That is the prosecutor's admission that Jerinx deserves to be released because the judge has made the proof wrong or the judge is wrong in applying the evidence," he said.

In addition, Gendo also appreciated the legal considerations from the appellate judge who stated that punishment was not a tool for revenge.

On this matter, Jerinx's lawyer requested that the indictment letter from the prosecutor be declared not legally and convincingly proven.

"So that the indictment of the prosecutor's cassation applicant is declared not legally and convincingly proven," he said.

Attorney Jerinx asked the Supreme Court to reject the appeal memory of the public prosecutor and release Jerinx to be acquitted of all charges and to have his reputation restored.

"Jerinx deserves to be released," said Gendo.