Labor Apologizes For The Case Of Satpol PP Members Kicked, Surabaya Police Chief Still Asks For The Legal Process To Be Continued

Public Relations DOC Of The Surabaya City Government

SURABAYA - The Surabaya City Satpol PP Office was visited by seven representatives of workers who were suspected of participating in the demonstration on Thursday, November 30. Several representatives of workers came to the Surabaya Satpol PP office to apologize for the case of arresting Satpol PP members.

The head of the Surabaya City Satpol PP, M. Fikser, said that he had met a group of people who claimed to be representatives of the labor organization at 15.30 WIB. Fikser explained that the purpose and purpose of the labor representatives was only to convey an apology.

"They (came) no promises, no correspondence or notifications. So they came to the spontaneity office, they only came to apologize for what happened yesterday (persecution)," said Fikser, Friday, December 1.

Fikser emphasized that he had forgiven the incidents of abuse committed by unscrupulous workers against two of his members during the demonstration yesterday. Fikser explained that at the meeting there was no discussion about the legal process and peaceful words for the abuse case.

But Satpol PP will continue to fight for the fate of its two members who experienced violence during labor demonstrations. According to him, the legal and justice processes will continue to run as they should.

"I'm sorry, but there is no discussing the word peace, the meeting process was not more than 5 minutes. Because I have to attend an event and they will also have an event, so the meeting was only five minutes," he explained.

Fikser said that at the meeting he did not know and knew clearly what group of workers came from. In fact, he also did not know whether the alleged perpetrators of the abuse of his members also participated in this meeting.

"They admitted it from the Guard, that's it. Then I asked for the purpose, it turned out that the goal was just to apologize. I don't know (the perpetrator), I don't know who the culprit was," he concluded.