JAKARTA - The trial in the alleged threats and money laundering (TPPU) case against Nikita Mirzani is heating up.
During the expert witness examination session, Nikita Mirzani openly questioned the credibility and competence of the ITE expert witness, Anindito, presented by the Public Prosecutor (JPU).
Nikita's main focus was the length of the expert's examination report (BAP), which she deemed inconsistent with the lack of explanations given during the trial.
"Can the expert explain the basis for this thick BAP? You didn't understand the questions earlier, so what is your analysis of the expert's opinion in this BAP? This BAP is so thick, but you don't know, can't answer, and don't understand every question. So, what does this BAP, expert analysis, mean?" Nikita Mirzani asked firmly during the hearing on Thursday, August 28.
Unfortunately, despite repeating her question several times, Anindito still didn't understand what Nikita Mirzani meant. Nikita nearly cried, believing he was hindering her from resolving the case.
"So whose analysis is this police report, an expert? I've been detained for seven months. An expert can also cause my detention," said Nikita Mirzani, holding back tears.
Not surprisingly, Nikita Mirzani's attorney, Fahmi Bachmid, also launched a harsh critique, stating that the witness did not deserve to be called an 'expert.'
"He's completely unfit to be an expert," said Fahmi Bachmid.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
