Nikita Mirzani Feels Abused By Prosecutors In The Money Laundering Case Reza Gladys

JAKARTA - Nikita Mirzani emphasized that he felt it was inappropriate to be accused of the alleged extortion and money laundering (TPPU) case reported by Reza Gladys some time ago.

"I hereby declare that I do not deserve to be detained for the loss which is an agreement in business, which is worth Rp. 4 billion," said Nikita Mirzani at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday, July 1.

He also said that the Public Prosecutor had committed acts against him on charges that had previously been read out.

"And I stated at this trial that the public prosecutor had committed an act by making heinous slander in the indictment addressed to me," said Nikita.

On this matter, Nikita asked the panel of judges so that the incident he called criminalization could stop in his case.

"The noble panel of judges, my beloved audience, (quietly crying) legal criminalization like this should not be allowed, because it will damage the legal order and destroy the joints of justice," said Nikita Mirzani.

"The criminalization of the dzalim acts committed arbitrarily by investigators from the Polda Metro Jaya and the Public Prosecutor at the South Jakarta District Attorney's Office to me is a crime against humanity that must be stopped," said Nikita.

At the previous trial, Nikita Mirzani was charged with committing a criminal act of extortion or electronic threats against Reza Gladys. In addition, Nikita was also charged with money laundering for the money she received from Reza Gladys, the crime was committed by Nikita and her assistant, Ismail Marzuki.

For their actions, Nikita and Ismail are suspected of violating Article 45 paragraph 10 letter A, Article 27B Paragraph (2) of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning the ITE Law with Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions or Article 3 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.

This combination of articles is generally used to ensnare the main actors and parties involved in cases of extortion or electronic threats.