AMIN National Team Concerning Sirekap: System Logarithmic Has Been Set To Win Certain Paslons
JAKARTA - The National Team for Winning Anies-Muhaimin (Timnas AMIN) admitted that it had conducted a forensic study on the strangeness of the results of the 2024 presidential election which was read in the Recapitulation Information System (Sirekap) belonging to the General Election Commission (KPU).From this analysis, AMIN National Team Expert Council Member Bambang Widjojanto suspects that there is a system design that is automatically made to make presidential and vice presidential candidate votes number 2, Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka above 50 percent."Based on the analysis of forensic studies of the KPU server, we suspect that there is a logarithmic system that has been set for winning certain candidate pairs," Bambang said at a press conference at the Change Coalition Headquarters, South Jakarta, Friday, February 16.Bambang claimed that his party found an increase in the number of votes from the conversion of the C1 form to Sirekap data input in many polling stations (TPS) automatically."There is a logarithmic system set for winning certain candidate pairs that automatically exceed 50 percent. Strong indications in that direction are confirmed by the discovery of fraud that occurred in certain areas," explained Bambang.Bambang gave an example of one of the alleged mark-up votes. In the C1 form documented at one of the polling stations in DKI Jakarta, Anies-Muhaimin's votes were 108, Prabowo-Gibran was 74, and Ganjar-Mahfud was 16 votes.However, during the conversion of data to the KPU system in Sirekap, the number of recorded Prabowo-Gibran votes jumped to 748 votes."This is really not just wrong writing, because it should be IT or artificial intelligence in the KPU IT system that he can read (without error)," said Bambang.Furthermore, Bambang admitted that the AMIN national team had repeatedly sent a letter to the KPU asking for an audit of the IT system for the election organizers. However, the request has never been followed up.
"So, if it's just a fundamental problem, the KPU can't do it, it's appropriate if we suspect that there are strong indications of building a system that has been automated," he added.