Lack Of Evidence, Supporter Ganjar Pranowo Fails To Police Anies Baswedan To Bareskrim

Daily Chairperson Of The DPP GP Center, Thomas Djunianto At The Criminal Investigation Unit Of The National Police (Rizky AP/VOI)

The Criminal Investigation Unit of the National Police rejected the report of supporters of Ganjar Pranowo or the GP Center against Anies Baswedan on suspicion of spreading fake news or hoaxes. The reason is the lack of evidence attached.

"Yes, it has not been (accepted). Because there is something incomplete," said the Daily Chair of the GP Center DPP, Thomas Djunianto, to reporters, Tuesday, May 23.

In an effort to report it, Anies Baswedan's statement when comparing the road construction issue in the Joko Widodo (Jokowi) era with Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) was the subject of the problem.

Secretary General of the GP Center, Bima Mutaqqal, said that the statement from the presidential candidate (readpres) promoted by the NasDem party did not match the data.

At that time, Anies gave a speech at the 21st birthday (HUT) of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) at Istora Senayan on Saturday, May 20.

It was stated that during Jokowi's leadership, the government built a 1,569-kilometer toll road out of a total of 2,499 kilometers.

Meanwhile, during SBY's leadership, it was stated that the construction of unpaid roads was tens of kilometers or 7.5 times.

Then, Anies also briefly compared the construction of national roads in the Jokowi era to around 500 kilometers and SBY to 11,800 kilometers or 20 times.

"(There is) wrong data said by Anies. In the end, the GP center also wants that, not to expand widely," he said.

"Moreover, we have seen for ourselves, there has been confusion on social media about this problem and there have been divisions among volunteers due to this problem," continued Bima.

However, it was not explained in detail about the difference between Anies Baswedan's statement and the data regarding road construction.

It is only mentioned if there are differences that are quite striking when compared to data from the Ministry of PUPR. Thus, Anies' statement was considered disturbing.

"There are 2 parameters through BPS and PUPR data, and we will submit the results," he said.

Returning to Thomas, he mentioned about the rejection of the report because there was one piece of evidence that had to be attached. So, his party will complete it first.

"Our data source has not been completed. Yes, comparative data sources, so the meaning must be there," he said.

If all the evidence is complete, he will return to the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Police to complete his report.

"We are coordinating with the strengthening of the evidence, so we will return here and hopefully it will be finished," said Thomas.