Lirikan Mario Dandy Ke Mantannya Sebelum Persidangan Di PN Jaksel
JAKARTA - The defendant Mario Dandy Satriyo was caught stealing a look at AG's child before the trial of the alleged abuse case David Ozora began.AG's son is one of three witnesses presented by the Public Prosecutor (JPU) at today's trial. While the other two are Chriswanda Oliver (37), and Rafael Benitez (19).The moment started when AG entered the courtroom. Then, he sat in the chair of the patient while waiting for the panel of judges to come.At that time, the defendant Mario Dandy, who was sitting with his team of lawyers on the right side of the courtroom, had time to steal his gaze. However, AG just kept looking down.Shortly thereafter, the panel of judges entered the courtroom. Chief Judge Alimin Ribut Sujono then opened the trial and immediately questioned the identities of the witnesses.The prosecutor then interrupted. He asked the panel of judges to hold the trial behind closed doors. The reason is that witness AG is a minor.Judge Alimin granted it. the court visitors to go out, including AG's companion."Because the witness is still a minor, the trial is carried out behind closed doors," said Judge Alimin.For information, AG is also a defendant in the case of the persecution of David Ozora. He was sentenced to 3.5 years in prison.Meanwhile, Mario Dandy was charged with serious abuse. He was charged with Article 355 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code Subsidiary 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code or to 2 Article 76 C in conjunction with Article 50 paragraph 2 of Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code.
Then, the defendant Shane Lukas was charged with Article 355 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code Junto Article 55 Paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code and a subsidiary of Article 355 paragraph 2 in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the primary Criminal Code with Article 355 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with 56 of the 2nd Criminal Code.