Delayed, Next Week BK Announces Examination Result Of DKI DPRD Chairman Regarding Interpellation Of Formula E
JAKARTA - The Honorary Board (BK) of the DKI Jakarta DPRD will announce the results of the examination by the Chairperson of the DKI DPRD, Prasetyo Edi Marsudi, regarding holding a plenary meeting of Interpellation Formula E next week.
Previously, the BK planned to disclose the results of Prasetyo's examination in mid-March. However, it turned out that the announcement of the results of the ethics trial was delayed.
"The results of the Honorary Board trial are available. However, the results cannot be disclosed before the final plenary session. Hopefully, the plenary session will be held next week," said Chairman of the DKI DPRD BK Achmad Nawawi in a short message, Wednesday, March 23.
As is known, on September 28, 2021, four Deputy Chairs of the DKI DPRD and seven factions of the DKI DPRD reported Prasetyo to the Honorary Board of the DKI DPRD for allegedly ignoring the DPRD rules and regulations by holding a plenary meeting of Interpellation Formula E. The seven factions are Gerindra, PKS, Democrats, Golkar, Nasdem, PAN, and PKB-PPP. Four months later, the DPRD BK finally summoned Prasetyo for questioning. Prasetyo's examination was held in the plenary meeting room on Wednesday, February 9.
BACA JUGA:
After being questioned at that time, Prasetyo considered himself innocent because he had scheduled an interpellation plenary meeting. This is because, although the interpellation plenary meeting was proposed by Bamus suddenly at the meeting, he considered it permissible.
"Because this is my clarification, I don't feel guilty to this day. It means that the entire interpellation is legal. The Bamus (meeting schedule) can increase and decrease," said Prasetyo at the DKI DPRD Building, Wednesday, February 9.
After all, said Prasetyo, if the seven DPRD factions who reported it to the Honorary Board did not want a plenary session of Interpellation Formula E, they could convey it at the plenary meeting directly, instead of being absent and reporting himself.
"Where did I go wrong? Actually, we all know that the problem must be resolved. What method should it be resolved? Yes, it will be completed. If it is not a quorum, then it will be completed again. I am still suspending the plenary session for the interpellation, because it is not a quorum," he explained.