Craig Wright Failed To Prove Himself Creator Of Bitcoin

Craig Wright falsified documents (Photo; Doc. Bitcoinist)

JAKARTA - Craig Wright, computer scientist who claims to be the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, has been found guilty of massive forgery by British High Court Judge James Mellor. Based on information from CryptoPotato, in a written ruling published on Monday, the word 'forgery' said 130 times, highlighting Wright's failed defense efforts earlier this year.

Judge Mellor insists that Wright has lied widely and repeatedly in court to support his claim as the creator of Bitcoin. Dr. Wright considers himself very smart, wrote Mellor. However, in my opinion, he is not as intelligent as he thought. This ruling follows a six-week trial against Wright's claim, with extraordinary' evidence showing otherwise.

Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a consortium of major crypto industry companies, has acted as plaintiffs in this case. COPA is committed to protecting open-source developers and removing patents as a barrier to crypto technology adoption. They have sought to end a series of defamation cases that Wright launched against his critics.

The Dismantling Of Wright's Lies

During the trial, COPA accused Wright of falsifying the scale of the industry by using fake documents to support his claim as the author of Bitcoin's whitepaper. Wright rejected the testimony of all expert witnesses who stated that the document was forgery, including experts employed by his own lawyer.

In the cross-examination, Wright was unable to name anyone who might support his claim as a 'Satoshi'. In fact, one of Wright's personal witnesses, his sister, only believes that Wright is Satoshi because of his love for Karate and Japanese names as a child.

Judge Mellor concluded that Wright used teknobabble to divert the blame for the counterfeiting that had been revealed. I got a clear impression that he only used teknobabble because he was unable to provide a coherent explanation for the counterfeiting that had been revealed, and he could not accept that he was responsible for it," the judge's knot.

Wright has stated on Twitter that he intends to appeal the court's decision regarding his identity. He also thanked those who supported him.