Indonesian Audit Watch Criticism Of Governance And Planning For The Coreliax Project

Illustration of corex (pixabay)

JAKARTA The government's claim that the beliax is a milestone for Indonesia's taxation is questioned by Indonesian Audit Watch (IAW). Iskandar Sitorus, Secretary of IAW's Founder, assessed that the project was built on a weak planning foundation and was vulnerable to conflicts of interest.

Iskandar said that from the start the beliax did not grow from healthy planning, but from a series of crises that were continuously handled without structural improvements. Even though Presidential Regulation Number 40 of 2018, Government Regulation Number 16 of 2018, as well as roadmaps for tax reform provided a complete legal basis, he said that project governance had been crippled since the planning stage.

According to Iskandar, the quintex planning design is set up with a "exciting" standard, not to encourage quality, but to potentially become a market sterilization mechanism.

He assessed that the criteria for cross-border experience, the portfolio value of hundreds of millions of US dollars, and global exclusive certification made domestic companies eliminated even before the competition process began.

At this point, said Iskandar, the two key actors are actually in the most vulnerable position to conflicts of interest. The first party prepares specifications as well as assesses who can work on it.

The second party supervises quality without going through open contestation. In the audit science, this is no longer a gray area, this is a conflict of interest at the level of systemic design," said Iskandar, Monday, December 8, 2025.

IAW assessed that the shift in interest was increasingly apparent when the South Korean LG CNS consortium with Austrian Qualysoft was designated as the official graffiti integrator system. According to Iskandar, the vendor's position became dominant because the failure to plan upstream had never been improved.

"Since then, the beliax has slowly shifted from the logic of state interests to the logic of vendor interests," said Iskandar in his statement, Monday, December 8.

From the perspective of state administrative law, Iskandar said that this condition was dangerous because it opened bad precedent space in national strategic projects. Based on IAW data and studies, the beliax actually inherits conflicts of interest, order design, and standards that have not been in favor of national technology sovereignty from the start.

Iskandar emphasized that the beliax was not successful because the design was appropriate, but because it was too strategic to be allowed to fail. He warned that without the opening of the upstream phase to the public, the next generation would only inherit the poled project as a success story even though it had fundamental problems.

"The nation that familiarizes itself with polishing failure will find it difficult to distinguish between true achievements and fake achievement windows," he said.