JAKARTA - Poltracking Indonesia implements a strict five-layer data verification process. Each survey result released by Poltracking Indonesia has gone through a series of tests and checks to ensure its validity and accuracy.

Director of Poltracking Indonesia, Masduri Amrawi said, this methodology makes Poltracking Indonesia trusted by the public and various parties as a precise and reliable data source.

He explained that the five-layer verification process includes geolocation, photo analysis, duration threshold, response consistency and phone confirmation. Each survey is required to pass every 5-layer verification stage to ensure the validity of the data obtained. This process is designed to minimize potential errors and increase confidence in the survey results.

The name of the respondent listed by the surveyor in Gondangdia-Menteng is not his full name. Geolocationally, the surveyor did a survey in Gondangdia-Menteng with 9 verified respondents," said Masduri, Monday, November 18.

Geolocation verification ensures that the survey is conducted in the correct location using latitude and longitude coordinates. This stage proves that the process of data taking place in the field is as planned and where it should be. This avoids potential manipulation of the survey location.

Furthermore, photo analysis verification is carried out to match respondents' demographic profiles with field data. This method helps ensure that the respondents interviewed are people who meet the survey criteria, so that the results can be trusted. With this step, the data produced by Poltracking Indonesia always shows high credibility.

The third stage of verification is the threshold duration, where the duration of the interview is monitored to ensure the interview lasts long enough to obtain deep data. Too short duration can be an indication that the survey is not carried out according to procedures. With the minimum duration limit of the survey, Poltracking Indonesia guarantees that the survey is carried out thoroughly.

"The consistency of the answer is also checked to ensure respondents do not provide opposite or confusing answers. Respondents who pass this verification are considered valid," added Masduri.

The last stage is confirmation of the phone, where Poltracking Indonesia contacted respondents to validate their participation in the survey. Despite the challenges in obtaining a phone number, Masduri ensured that this aspect did not reduce data validity.

"In the survey experience, it is difficult for respondents to provide a phone number, so there is the potential for surveyors to fill out their own phone numbers. But in verification we don't just focus on telephone. There are 4 other verification instruments," he said.

Masduri emphasized that data verification at Poltracking Indonesia does not only rely on one aspect, but includes five verification instruments that have been set to ensure accurate data. With this method, the Poltracking Indonesia survey is recognized to have passed a strict test and deserves to be trusted as a decision reference. This accuracy is the main difference between Poltracking Indonesia and other survey institutions.

The success of this five-layer data verification process ensures that Poltracking Indonesia continues to be a pioneer in providing accurate and reliable data. The public and survey users can feel safe with Indonesian Poltracking data because they have been verified through a very strict process.

It is proven that Poltracking has always been the survey agency with the most accurate traces and reputation in various elections. During its 12 years of existence, Poltracking Indonesia has always been the main reference for the public in seeing the election results quickly.

Even the accuracy of Poltracking Indonesia is recognized by one of the PERSEPI survey institute associations which states that Poltracking Indonesia is the most accurate survey agency among its members above Litbang Kompas, SMRC, Political and LSI Indicators and Charta Politica. The Indonesian Poltracking Survey Institute is accurate and most precise approaching the results of the recapitulation of the General Election Commission (KPU) vote count in the 2024 presidential election. The average difference in Poltracking's quick count is only 0.12 percent compared to other survey institutions.

"Even the data can be seen that the difference in the quick count results is less than 1 percent, 0.1 to 0.5 percent of the incoming data is 100 percent. Now that is very accurate," said Chairman of the Internal Division of the Indonesian Public Opinion Survey Association (Persepi) Arya Fernandes.

Likewise in various previous elections, Poltracking Indonesia succeeded in becoming the most precise and accurate survey agency predicting the winners and results of the 2019 presidential election real count, most precision predicting the winners and results of the 2019 Legislative Real count, the most accurate predicting Anies-Sandi will be able to win the 2017 DKI Jakarta Pilkada against Ahok-Djarot, most accurately predicting Jokowi as the 2014 Presidential candidate with the most potential of the regional head.

Poltracking Indonesia proved to be the most accurate in the Quick Count of the 2019 Presidential Election, Quick Count of the 2020 Bengkulu Pilkada the winning numbers are exactly the same as the KPU's real count. Quick Count of the 2020 Central Sulawesi Pilkada is the most precise with the KPU's real count results.


The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)