Presidential candidate number 3, Ganjar Pranowo, said that there were three constitutional judges who expressed dissenting opinions in this decision. The three judges are Saldi Isra, Enny Nurbaningsih, and Arief Hidayat. The different opinions of the three judges of the Constitutional Court (MK) are said to be interesting in the trial of the 2024 Presidential Election dispute (Pilpres).
According to him, constitutional judges do not only talk about figures in dispute over election results. However, it is more substantive. In fact, it is said, Judge Arief Hidayat in his dissenting opinion granted a lawsuit from his camp and Anies-Cak Imin. This means that the judge has room or freedom to decide his decision.
Although, overall the lawsuit of the two applicants was rejected. The Constitutional Court decided to reject the request of the Ganjar-Mahud camp regarding the Dispute over the 2024 Presidential and Vice Presidential Election Results (PHPU). There are several arguments in the petition submitted, such as allegations of ethical violations during the 2024 presidential election.
Then, there was a nepotism action carried out by President Joko Widodo. Allegations regarding the occurrence of coordinated abuse of power in all lines of government, and alleged violations of election procedures that occurred before the voting process took place at SIREKAP. Watch the video below.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
