Quick Count 03 Results Lost At Banteng Kandang, Ganjar: A Little Anomaly Yes

President Ganjar Pranowo's candidate was met in Jakarta, Thursday 15 February (Rizky AP/VOI)

Presidential candidate number 3, Ganjar Pranowo suspects that there is an anomaly behind the results of the quick count or quick count of the 2024 Presidential Election (Pilpres) in a number of regions.

He conveyed this assumption when answering questions about Ganjar-Mahfud's vote acquisition at the lowest position in Central Java, Bali, Yogyakarta Special Region (DIY) to East Nusa Tenggara (NTT).

According to him, the allegation is based on the comparison of the results of the PDIP vote acquisition at the Legislative Election (Pileg) level.

"The quick count, the real count hasn't yet. The result of the quick count obtained by PDI-P, I think it's still high, if I'm not mistaken, it's still number one. It's a bit an anomaly with my voice," Ganjar told reporters, Thursday, February 15.

In areas that are often called bull cages, Ganjar-Mahfud's votes lost to the Prabowo-Gibran pair.

Therefore, Ganjar said that his party was investigating the striking comparison between the votes of the presidential and legislative elections. The hope is that the cause behind it can be found soon.

"So today it is being investigated by friends, hopefully later we will find out what the factor is," said Ganjar.

For example, the Kompas Litbang quick count with data entering reached 88.45 percent as of 21.21 WIB, the Prabowo-Gibran pair received 58.73 percent of the votes. Meanwhile, 3 Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud MD only got 16.17 percent.

Then, the quick count of the Kompas Litbang for the 2024 Legislative Election (Pileg) showed that the top PDI-P with 17.28 percent, even though the data position that entered was still 60.90 percent.