Joko Tjandra Wondered Asked For Security Deposit Until Finally Rejected Action Plan Pinangki-Andi Irfan

Joko Tjandra (DOK. ANTARA)

JAKARTA - The defendant in a case of alleged gratification in the fatwa arrangement of the Supreme Court (MA) Joko Tjandra revealed the reasons for rejecting the action plan presented by Attorney Pinangki Sirna Malasari and Andi Irfan Jaya.

The reason for the rejection of the action plan was revealed when the prosecutor confirmed the contents of Joko Tjandra's investigation report (BAP). In the BAP, Joko Tjandra said that not one point from the action plan was understood.

"On the 29th, after I received the action plan, I read from the 10 points of the action plan, not one of the action plans I could understand," said the prosecutor reading out the BAP at the trial at the Corruption Court, Jakarta, Thursday, February 25.

"Masksudnya?" the prosecutor asked.

Joko Tjandra explained the reason in question was about not understanding the contents of the action plan. First, regarding the security deposit which resulted in pawning his assets. According to him, this is not a strange and absurd thing.

"One, for example, asked me to provide a security deposit by giving absolute rights, substitution, to pawn my assets. Authorized them to set prices and sell at any time. The security deposit that was requested of me. It was for the rest of my life. So far, as an entrepreneur for more than 55 years, I have never read such a power of attorney, "said Joko Tjandra.

Another reason, one of the action plans contained a legal action against the Bank Bali cassie case which seemed very easy. In fact, so far Joko Tjandra, who has repeatedly made legal efforts, always ends in failure.

"Second, that it is so simple, so easy. because I have also experienced legal action to the Constitutional Court, to the Supreme Court and so on, it never happened within 24 hours. The prosecutor sent a letter to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court on the same day and second replied back by giving a fatwa decision, "he said.

"I consider it something unusual, and could not possibly happen," said Joko.

Another reason is because Attorney Pinangki and Andi Irfan Jaya have asked him to pay a consultant fee. In fact, according to him, they have not worked on the legal remedies contained in the action plan.

"The third point, I haven't worked yet, that's just a proposal, I've been billed another 25 percent of the consultant fee, which they haven't worked," said Joko.

"Fourth, they haven't worked yet, they ask to pay 100 percent of the media consultant for 500 thousand dollars, even though (points) 1 to 4 there are no activities," he continued.

In fact, Joko Tjandra also mentioned points five to seven relating to legal remedies are increasingly absurd. Moreover, there is a request for payment of 10 million United States dollars (US).

With the contents of the action plan that made no sense, Joko Tjandra decided to reject it. Although, I have read several times and convinced myself.

"I told Anita, this is a blowout, this is not a proposal. This is a fraudulent proposal. I don't want any more contact with those people," said Joko.