Ganjar Called Prabowo Tendensius About Human Rights, Mardiono Reminds Digital Traces

Plt Ketum PPP Muhamad Mardiono/PHOTO: Abdul Aziz Masindo-VOI

JAKARTA - Acting General Chairperson of PPP Mardiono responded to Prabowo Subianto's statement that Ganjar Pranowo was tententsius regarding the handling of cases of human rights violations in the presidential candidate debate. Mardiono spoke of digital traces.

"The public can interpret it all, that the digital footprint is in the course of these figures. The people are all pocketing it, especially since the digital footprint is easy to turn back," said Mardiono at the Ganjar-Mahfud TPN Winning Post in Kebon Sirih, Central Jakarta, Wednesday, December 13.

"Where are the steps of our leaders that cannot be denied, that is certain," he continued.

Mardiono also said that the tendentious connotation of Ganjar made by Prabowo could be broken by facts.

"It is broken by how can prove, can prove that what is explained by other parties or competitors is not true, that reality must be proven by facts," said Mardiono.

"So it's not tendentious or tendentious, but you have to show it and it must be clear right," he continued.

In the presidential candidate debate, Tuesday, December 12, Prabowo Subianto's presidential candidate assessed that Ganjar Pranowo's question was tendentious regarding past human rights violations.

"Well, how come I say I'm not firm? I will firmly uphold human rights. The problem you ask is a bit tendentious," said Prabowo.

Prabowo also mentioned that the 13 missing people who took care of this problem were Deputy Ganjar, namely Mahfud MD when he served as Chairman of the Constitutional Court.

"Why was it asked me when 13 people were missing? That's tendentious, sir. And the deputy father who took care of this so far. So, if the decision is to hold a human rights court, we hold a human rights court, there is no problem," he added.