Through Handwriting, Jessica Wongso Denies Mirna's Father's Statement, Never Sells A House To Pay Lawyer Otto Hasibuan

Jessica Wongso/DOK ANTARA

Jessica Kumala Wongso dismissed Mirna Salihin's father, Edi Darmawan Salihin, who said that he sold the house to pay lawyer Otto Hasibuan who accompanied the legal process for the cyanide case.

"If there is a statement that my / my father / mother / family are blackmailed and selling houses or property for Pak Otto Hasibuan's legal service fee, then this is completely untrue," Jessica said in a letter uploaded to Otto Hasibuan's lawyer's Instagram account, Wednesday, October 11.

Mirna Salihin's father previously said that Jessica Wongso was blackmailed by the famous lawyer Otto Hasibuan to help with legal assistance in the cyanide coffee case that killed Mirna.

"Pak Otto provides pro-bono services for this legal problem," said Jessica.

"From the bottom of my heart, my family and I would like to express our deepest gratitude to Pak Otto Hasibuan who has helped with hard work, sincerity, and without any pay," he added.

Head of the Legal Information Center (Kapuspenkum) of the Attorney General's Office, Ketut Sumedana, confirmed that the murder case of Wayan Mirna Salihin by Jessica Wongso had been completed with all the evidence and testing carried out.

Therefore, there is no reason to declare that there was an error or error in the judge's decision.

"I declare that the case has been completed, because it has been tested five times at various court levels starting from the district court, high court, Supreme Court, and even two extraordinary legal remedies have been made in the form of PK (reconsideration)," Sumedana said as quoted by ANTARA, Tuesday, October 10.

Sumedana spoke about Jessica Wongso's case because many media asked her, after the viral case known as Cyanide coffee was raised through a documentary film at one of the providers of digital media streaming services with the title Ice Cold.

The former Deputy Head of the Bali High Prosecutor's Office explained that the documentary film greatly influenced public opinion on the case that occurred in early 2016.

According to him, the public prosecutor has been able to convince the judge in the process of proving at various levels, and none of the members of the Panel of Judges stated that the Dissenting Opinion or had different opinions.

"In my opinion, this proof is perfect to show Jessica's brother is the culprit, as a person blamed based on a court decision that has permanent law," he said.