Allegations Of Negligence To The Death Of Bripda Ignatius Dwi Need To Be Explained So That The Police Are Unknown To The Blue Curtain Code

Karopenmas Police Public Relations Division Brigadier General Ahmad Ramadhan (left) accompanied by the Head of the Densus 88 Anti-terror Division of the National Police, Kombes Christ R. Pusung (right)/ANTARA

JAKARTA - forensic psychology expert Reza Indragiri Amriel advised the National Police to be transparent in investigating the death of Bripda Ignatius Dwi Frisco Sirage (IDS), which was allegedly due to his senior negligence when he showed illegal homemade firearms. Reza emphasized that the police needed to explain what kind of negligence caused the death of Bripda IDF. What kind of negligence? It needs to be opened. This question arises because the police organization is often known as the Blue Curtain Code, the Blue Curtain Code, ” he said who was contacted in Jakarta, Antara, Sunday, July 30. This Blue Curtain code, said Reza, is a tendency to cover up the error of the corps. According to him, the findings regarding the existence of a silent code (Blue Curtain Code) are in contrast to the police statement which will always be transparent and objective in case disclosure. Because, only a year ago, the Indonesian people were shocked by the tragedy of the murder of Brigadier Nofriansyah Yosua Hutabarat by his own superior, Ferdy Sambo. The incident shows a portrait of senior atrocities towards juniors that had been covered up with events and facts. Until finally the family of Brigadier Josua and netizens spoke up, then transparency and objectivity were carried out seriously, until the Blue Curtain Code was caught. The criminologist encouraged the National Police to form an investigative team involving external parties to answer the prejudice of the family who suspected that the IDF Bripda was murdered in a planned manner, plus the massive skepticism of netizens. However, he did not recommend the National Police to involve Kompolnas as an external party in the investigation team because of historical records in the murder case of Brigadier Josua, the National Police Commission confirmed “ investigation ” South Jakarta Police that the death of Brigadier Josua was due to gunfire. The involvement of external elements outside Kompolnas in investment is an expensive price that must be paid by the Police to restore public trust. " “ Yes, what can be done. This is an example of an expensive price that the Police have to pay for due to a crisis of public trust," he said. Regarding the negligence conveyed by the Police, Reza said that the family could file a lawsuit against the Police. This is common for people in Western countries. “In the West, residents have often sued the police for police misconduct. Negligence can also be material for the lawsuit. In order to avoid the legal process, the police usually choose to provide compensation directly to the families of the victims,” he said. However, Reza continued, to find out who should be sued whether the personnel who committed negligence or the institution, the National Police needed to clarify the form of negligence that caused Bripda IDF to be shot dead. “ Who was sued? The person who committed negligence or the police institution? Depending on the form of negligence. That's why I gave a message: explain what form of negligence is, ” said Reza. Previously, Bripda IDF was shot dead due to the negligence of his co-worker who showed illegal homemade firearms on Sunday (23/7) at the Police Flats, Cikeas, Bogor Regency, West Java. Two members of the National Police from the Special Detachment (Densus) 88 Anti-terror Police have been named as suspects, namely Bripda IMS and Bripka IG. Both were declared to have violated the code of ethics for the category of serious violations and the criminal act of Article 338.

Bripda IMS is subject to Article 338 or Article 359 of the Criminal Code and/or Law Number 12 of 1951. Meanwhile, the suspect Bripka IG is subject to Article 338 in conjunction with Article 56 and/or Article 359 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 56 of the Criminal Code and/or the Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951. Both face the death penalty, or life imprisonment or a temporary prison sentence of up to 20 years.