The Sindir Prosecutor For Recognition, Irfan Widyanto, Concerning Permit To Take CCTV Behind The Trial Facts

The defendant Irfan Widyanto underwent a trial in the case of obstruction of justice at the death of Brigadier J at the South Jakarta District Court. (Between)

The public prosecutor (JPU) assessed that the defendant's camp, Irfan Widyanto, concluded that he had received permission to take and replace the CCTV DVR of the Police Complex security post, Duren Tiga. In fact, it contradicts the facts of the trial.

" unilaterally, the defendant's legal adviser did not want to admit the fact and instead assumed to have asked the security guard for permission," said the prosecutor at the South Jakarta District Court, Monday, February 6.

Referring to the testimony and facts of the trial, several witnesses said that the defendant Irfan Widyanto had never asked for permission. Thus, his actions have been proven to have violated the rules.

"This can be seen from the way the defendant's legal advisor discussed the facts of witness Abdul Zafar, witness Marjuki, and Seno Sukarto as the head of the RT which clearly explained the actions of the defendant who took and replaced the CCTV DVR were without their permission, especially without permission from the head of the RT Polri Duren Tiga Complex," explained the prosecutor.

"This is clearly contrary to the facts of the trial as well as the facts on the manner of action or role of the defendant in taking and replacing the CCTV DVR, which is also not explained by the defendant's legal adviser as a whole," he continued.

Moreover, the CCTV DVR was not equipped with an administrative process. For example, warrants to public court permits.

"The fact at that time that the defendant took action or the role of the defendant in taking, replacing, handing over CCTV DVR was not accompanied by an investigation warrant, a confiscation warrant, a confiscation report, a receipt letter from the owner, a confiscation permit from the head of the District Court as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code and the ITE Law," said the prosecutor.

In the case of obstruction of justice in the death of Brigadier J, the defendant Irfan Widyanto is said to have played a role in taking CCTV DVR at the security post of the Police Complex, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. This was done on orders from the defendant Agus Nurpatra.

Thus, his actions are believed to have violated Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code.