MATARAM - Former Head of the Department of Agriculture, Food Crops, and Horticulture (PTPH) of Bima Regency, West Nusa Tenggara M. Tayeb was charged with corruption of IDR 5.1 billion in the production and printing of new rice fields for the 2016 fiscal year.

The act which stated that M. Tayeb had committed a criminal act of corruption was revealed in the inaugural trial with the agenda of reading the indictment by the public prosecutor at the Mataram Corruption Crime District Court (Tipikor), Monday.

"The defendant in this case did not carry out his duties as a commitment-making official in accordance with the implementing instructions for the activity, resulting in a loss of Rp. 5.1 billion from a total budget of Rp. 14.4 billion," said Sigit representing the public prosecutor reading out M. Tayeb's indictment quoted by ANTARA, Monday, January 30.

In the indictment, the prosecutor charged M. Tayeb with Article 2 paragraph (1) and/or Article 3 in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code.

"With this, the defendant M. Tayeb as the person who did, ordered to do, and participated in corruption that enriched himself or other people," he said.

The prosecutor stated that M. Tayeb jointly committed criminal acts of corruption with two other people, namely Muhammad, former Head of Land Development Rehabilitation and Plant Protection Division of the Bima Regency PTPH, and Nur Mayangsari, Head of Section (Kasi) Rehabilitation and Land Development (RPL) of the Bima Regency PTPH Office. inactive.

In this case, Muhammad and Nur Mayangsari also had the status of defendants who underwent their first trial with M. Tayeb.

So in the indictment, the prosecutor also revealed the role of two other defendants by first explaining that the Rp14.4 billion distribution budget came from the Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture to help increase food production in Bima Regency.

It was recorded that 241 farmer groups (poktan) in Bima Regency were included in the list of beneficiaries with details of Rp8.9 billion for 158 poktan that manage 4,447 hectares of rice fields and Rp5.5 billion for 83 poktans with a rice area of 2,780 hectares.

"The distribution of the budget is carried out directly to the banking accounts of each group," he said.

The disbursement was carried out in two stages. The first stage was IDR 10.3 billion, 70 percent of the total budget was IDR 14.4 billion, and 30 percent in the second stage with a value of IDR 4.1 billion.

When the budget has entered a poktan personal account, he continued, M. Tayeb as the official commitment maker issued an order to withdraw cash to the poktan. The money was requested to be collected back at the Bima Regency PTPH Service.

"The collection of the budget that should have been managed independently by each group was withdrawn on the orders of the defendant M. Tayeb. The withdrawal was not proven by the submission note," said Sigit.

The appointment of CV Mitra Agro Santosa as a Saprodi provider is also under the orders of M. Tayeb. Goods purchased from the company include rice seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides.

"However, there are several items of goods that cannot be provided by CV Mitra Agro Santosa so that some are purchased from local provider companies," he said.

After the money was collected from the poktan, on the orders of M. Tayeb, Muhammad and Nur Mayangsari made a payment to CV Mitra Agro Santosa, which is located in Jombang, East Java.

Nur Mayangsari as Muhammad's subordinate also received orders to make two memorandums of saprodi orders for CV Mitra Agro Santosa with details of the first note amounting to Rp8.9 billion and for the second order Rp1.7 billion.

The prosecutor also assessed that the saprodi order was not in accordance with the area of the poktan rice fields registered in the implementation instructions. So there is a shortage that now appears as a value of state losses of Rp. 5.1 billion.

After the indictment was read out, three defendants through their respective legal advisors stated to file an exception.

The judge heard this and then closed the trial by stating that the trial was postponed until Monday, February 6, with the agenda of reading the exceptions of each defendant.


The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)