The National Police Chief Had Asked The Former Karo Paminal About The Shooting Case Of Brigadier J: How Is The Problem Of Harassment?

National Police Chief General Listyo Sigit Prabowo (Photo: BPMI Setpres/Kris)

JAKARTA - Former Karo Paminal Hendra Kurniawan revealed directions from the National Police Chief General Listyo Sigit Prabowo at the beginning of the premeditated murder case of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J.

The National Police Chief's directive was given when Hendra Kurniawan and Benny Ali were asked to appear in their room. At the meeting, the two of them explained the chronology of the incident as told by Ferdy Sambo.

"Asked by him (the National Police Chief, ed), Mr. Benny was once asked, the incident was told about the shooting and harassment incident because Mr. Benny met PC (Putri Candrawathi)," Hendra said during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday, December 6.

At that time, the National Police Chief gave the first direction. They were asked to resolve the case professionally.

"At that time there was only one order from the National Police Chief, 'yes, it has been handled professionally and procedurally even though it happened at the Kadiv Propam's house," said Hendra, imitating the National Police Chief's statement.

Then, the National Police Chief had asked about the alleged abuse experienced by Putri Candrawati. However, at that time Hendra could not explain so he threw her at Ferdy Sambo.

"How is the harassment problem?" said Hendra imitating the National Police Chief's statement.

"Maybe it's from Mr. FS (Ferdy Sambo) general," said Hendra at the time.

For information, Ferdy Sambo believes that sexual harassment is the main factor in the murder of Brigadier J. Because, he thinks that the dignity of his family has been tainted.

Ferdy Sambo and Putri Candrawathi were jointly charged with the murder of Brigadier J at the Police Complex, Duren Tiga.

Ferdy Sambo is referred to as planning the murder. Meanwhile, Putri supports and helps her husband.

Thus, they were charged with violating Article 340 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary to Article 338 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to (1) of the Criminal Code.