Defending Bahar Smith, Refly Harun Calls Gus Arya's Statement More 'Dangerous' Because Of God's Criticism And Religious Groups

Constitutional Law Expert Refly Harun (Youtube Refly Harun)

JAKARTA - Constitutional Law expert Refly Harun joined the voice following a viral video showing Nofi Faryanto alias Gus Arya passionately talking about God.

When compared, what Gus Arya said had nothing to do with Bahar Smith who alluded to the Army Chief of Staff (KSAD) General Dudung Abdurachman through a lecture.

"I say in this context what Habib Bahar said has nothing to do with what Gus Arya said. Habib Bahar criticizes, say General Dudung, criticizes say what General Dudung says criticizing the KM-50 for example but this is criticizing God and groups or groups religion," explained Refly Harun through his YouTube channel @Refly Harun, reported by VOI, Tuesday, January 18.

Gus Arya spoke about the defense of Habib Zein Assegaf alias Habib Kribo, which has been buzzing about on social media recently. According to him, the figure of Habib Kribo must be supported because he is brave and defends Indonesia.

For Gus Arya, there are already many parties who like to trade verses for personal gain but it is different from what Habib Kribo is fighting for. "We, one of the indigenous people support that, they are all scumbags, who like to trade people like to trade intercession, love to trade verses, like to trade religion behavior..."

"Show me now, where is your God now, which God do you believe in showing me, answer that, where is your God showing me, celing, what do you see, what kind of celing, show me where is your God," said Gus Arya in the video quoted from Youtube @NUANSA ISLAM.

Meanwhile, Bahar, in one of his lectures, said that General Dudung would still worship trees if Arab clerics did not come to Indonesia. This bahar lecture went viral and received various responses from netizens.

Refly added that Gus Arya's words were inappropriate because they seemed to oppose God and were full of swearing. Even if this is aimed at groups that have been at odds with the government, this actually shows immaturity in politics.

"This is a real issue that should not be touched, we must show our emotional maturity, how angry we are at a phenomenon. There is no need to be angry, for who is angry," explained Refly.

Moreover, groups that have been at odds with the government or critical have even greater potential. Refly said that at any time the authorities could monitor or monitor the movement of this group of critics.

"That's why I think that people who are angry are definitely people who have problems in their own lives, not people who then try to solve problems because the targeted groups are also not groups who live comfortably, who get facilities from the state. and power is precisely a group that is critical of power," said Refly.