Dad Allegedly Uses Child to Sue Mother for 'Gono Gini' Property

Serang District Court, Banten/ Photo: IST

JAKARTA - A biological mother with the initials OLH was sued by her own biological child with the initials AM at the Serang District Court (PN).

Through his lawyer, OLH and the team of advocates, Suhandi Cahaya hopes that the Serang PN will reject all the lawsuits in case No. 198/PDT.G/2025/PN SRG.

The contents of the lawsuit state that the plaintiff is AM, the biological child of OLH as the defendant.

The lawyer team also said that the lawsuit was about the joint agreement deed for the transfer of the common property assets (gono-gini) that were the object of the dispute.

"The deed of agreement for the transfer of gono-gini was made in front of notary HTA No. 37 dated 19-11-2019 which states that DSD has transferred the "gono-gini" rights to his two children so that he automatically loses his legal rights," he said in a statement received, Tuesday, January 27, 2026.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff and defendant II are also parties to the deed of agreement No. 5 dated February 23, 2024 which states the power of attorney that has been read and understood, then signed in a conscious state and with the content of the content clearly frees the Notary and witnesses from all forms of anything in anything regarding things later.

However, in reality, continued Suhandi, the DSD forced and threatened notary TT by reporting to the MPN for the unilateral cancellation of the power of attorney.

However, the notary who made the deed could not do it because the cancellation could only be made by agreement of the 2 parties.

Then the plaintiff also sued Notary TT, the maker of the deed of agreement as defendant I and OLH as defendant II and the Head of the North Jakarta BPN Office as defendant III.

"At the time of mediation between the plaintiff and the defendant, it was proven that the plaintiff said that he did not know anything about the contents of the lawsuit. So it is clear that this child was only asked to attend to sue his mother, even though this child is the heir to his own mother," he said.

"By filing the lawsuit for the a quo matter, as in article 838 of the Civil Code, he should have lost the right to inherit the property of the defendant II, namely his mother," added the team of lawyers.

In fact, he continued, the lawsuit is in the process of cassation by the Supreme Court.

It is known that DSD is the source of interested parties in the cassation case against the civil case No. 223/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Utr and case No. 224 /Pdt.G/2024/PN.Jkt.Utr, which in the first level was won by OLH but the High Court overturned the decision without a strong basis.

Meanwhile, in case No. 222/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Jkt.Utr, the first level of the PN was won by OLH and the High Court upheld the decision.

"Based on this, the OLH lawyer team appealed to the Serang District Court through the panel of judges who tried the case a quo to reject all of the plaintiff's claims or not acceptable," he said.