Baim Wong Denies Conducting Illegal Access Access For Evidence At Divorce Session
JAKARTA - Baim Wong's party, represented by their attorney, Fahmi Bachmid, denied Paula Verhoeven's accusations of illegal access to evidence in their divorce trial. Fahmi said that Baim and Paula exchanged their respective gadget passwords so that there was no such thing as illegal access. "Wife's husband can't possibly have illegal access, husband and wife hold passwords with each other. That means they can open to each other," explained Fahmi Bachmid at the South Jakarta Religious Court, Wednesday, December 18. "The second person who has the right to judge is not a lawyer but is the panel of judges who judge. So whether it's a judge who has (authority), explained Fahmi Bachmid. "It means that Fahmi Bachmid is not rejected. Later it will be judged, because at the time of the proof process is confronted, it is true that this is not the data from you," he said. Previously, Paula's attorney, Alvon Kurnia Palma discussed related to the illegal allegations of access on evidence submitted by Baim, which is feared to violate the ITE Law.
SEE ALSO:
"Then there is also if, for example, the evidence is taken from another cellphone, it's called illegal access, which carries a penalty there. In the ITE Law," he continued.