Examination Of The Director Of Gratification And Public Services Of The KPK Completed, Asked 13 Questions About His Position

JAKARTA - Director of Gratification and Public Service of the KPK, Herda Helmijaya, has finished undergoing examination as a witness in the alleged extortion case against the former Minister of Agriculture, Syahrul Yasin Limpo, at the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Police. Investigators are said to have asked 13 questions regarding his position.

"Around his knowledge regarding his position. There are 13 questions," said Deputy Director of Corruption Crimes at Bareskrim Polri, Kombes Arief Adiharsa when confirmed, Wednesday, November 15.

The examination process for Herda Helmijaya lasted for three hours. Starting from 10.00 WIB to 13.00 WIB.

But there were no details regarding the results of the examination. It was only emphasized that the examination of the Director of Gratification and Public Services of the KPK had been completed.

"It's finished (the examination)," said Arif.

In the series of investigations, investigators also examined one other witness, today.

Director of Special Criminal Investigation of Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Ade Safri Simanjuntak did not provide a detailed explanation.

"One witness examination at the Tipidkor Sub-Directorate of the Ditreskrimsus Polda Metro Jaya," said Ade.

Regarding the investigation to determine the suspect, investigators have examined 94 witnesses and experts as of November 13. The details are 86 witnesses and 8 experts.

Meanwhile, witnesses who have been examined include Syahrul Yasin Limpo, former aide to Firli Bahuri, Kevin Egananta. Then there is the Semarang Police Chief Kombes Pol Irwan Anwar, Director of Dumas KPK Tomi Murtomo, as well as two former KPK leaders Saut Situmorang and M Jasin.

There is also the Director of Agricultural Equipment and Machinery of the Ministry of Agriculture Muhammad Hatta.

For experts, it is not known in detail. However, investigators had asked for the views of criminal law experts, procedural law experts, multimedia experts, and micro expressions experts.

In this case, it is suspected that there was a criminal act that occurred, namely, Article 12 letter e, Article 12 letter B and or Article 11 of the Corruption Crime Act in conjunction with Article 65 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.