The Decision Of The Prima Party Against The KPU, KY Recalls The Chairman Of The Central Jakarta District Court
JAKARTA - The Judicial Commission (KY) has made a recall to the Chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court regarding the decision of the People's Party Adil Makmur (Prima) against the General Election Commission (KPU) to postpone the election. "This second summons was made on Tuesday, June 6, 2023," said Spokesperson for the Indonesian Judicial Commission Miko Ginting, quoted by ANTARA, Wednesday, June 7.Miko said that the Chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court was present to fulfill the summons as a witness in the context of this examination. The examination material is closed and is only used for ethical purposes. This examination aims to find out whether there are allegations of violations of the ethics and behavior of judges or not. Not only that, said Miko, summons to the Panel of Judges, the Judicial Commission will be recalled. He hopes that the Panel of Judges can use this opportunity in this case to provide an explanation," he explained. Previously, the Central Jakarta District Court granted the Prima Party's claim against the KPU not to carry out the remaining stages of the 2024 election and carry out the election stages from the beginning for approximately two years and four months and seven days. "Law the defendant (KPU) not to carry out the remaining stages of the 2024 General Election since this decision was pronounced and carry out the stages of general elections from the beginning for approximately two years and four months and seven days," said the Central Jakarta District Court Judge Assembly chaired by Oyong, as quoted from decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Pst.
اقرأ أيضا:
The consideration of the panel of judges in the decision is to restore and create a fair condition and protect so that as early as possible other incidents due to inaccuracies, inaccuracies, unprofessionalism, and injustice by the defendant, in this case the KPU. In addition, the panel of judges also stated that legal facts have proven that there has been an error condition in the Political Party Information System (Sipol) caused by the quality factor of the tools used or factors outside the infrastructure.