Coreng Citra Polri Is One Of The Considerations Of Attorney Agus Nurpatra 3 Years In Prison

Agus Nurpatra/PHOTO: Rizky Adytaia-VOI

JAKARTA - The public prosecutor (JPU) charged the defendant Agus Nurpatra with imprisonment for 3 years. One of his considerations was that his actions obstructed the investigation into the death of Yosua alias Brigadier J had tarnished the image of the Police. "The defendant's actions have tarnished the good name of the National Police institution," said the prosecutor during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Friday, January 27. In addition, Agus Nurpatra as an officer of the Bhayangkara Corps is considered not to have committed acts that are against the rules. Terutama, soal perintahnya kepada Irfan Widyanto untuk mengambil dan mengganti DVR CCTV itu tak berdasarkan adanya surat perintah. "The defendant knows for sure that all legal actions taken must have a valid warrant," said the prosecutor. Meanwhile, for mitigating considerations, Agus Nurpatra was considered polite during the trial. Then, it has been decades of service to the state as a member of the National Police. "The defendant has served as a police officer for more than 20 years, while carrying out his duties as a police officer the defendant did not commit a disgraceful act," said the prosecutor. The defendant Agus Nurpatra was charged with 3 years in prison and a fine of Rp. 20 million, a subsidiary of 3 months. The defendant Agus Nurpatra is considered to have obstructed the investigation because he ordered Irfan Widyanto to take and replace the CCTV DVR at the Regional Police Complex Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. Thus, witness Irfan complied with the order. In fact, the CCTV DVR is important evidence to reveal the veil of the death of Brigadier J. Moreover, the CCTV footage shows Brigadier J still alive when Ferdy Sambo comes to his official residence. In addition, the CCTV DVR also denied Ferdy Sambo's scenario about the death of Brigadier J because of a shootout with Richard Karjan alias Bharada E. With his series of involvements, Agus Nurpatra is considered to have violated Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 subsidiary Article 48 in conjunction with Article 32 paragraph (1) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions junto Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code.