Prosperous To The Prosecutor's Conclusion, Strong Ma'ruf: Is It Because It's Difficult To Understand The Questions "I'm Involved?"

The defendant is Strong Ma'ruf (Photo of Rizky Adytia Pramana/VOI)

JAKARTA - The defendant Strong Ma'ruf was surprised by the conclusion of the public prosecutor (JPU) who considered him involved in the series of premeditated murder of Yosua alias Brigadier J. In fact, it is suspected that the conclusion was made just because he did not understand the questions raised during the evidentiary process in the trial. "I respect Your Majesty, whether it is because I have difficulty understanding what was asked of me, it proves that I participated in planning the murder of the late Yosua," said Strong at the trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday, January 24. Strongly also considers that the conclusion was made because the answer he submitted was not in accordance with the prosecutor's wishes. Moreover, he is always labeled a liar. In fact, Strong claims to have spoken honestly. The lies he conveyed were only during the investigation process. Even that was solely on the orders of Ferdy Sambo. "Is it because I answered that it was not in accordance with the wishes of those who asked, it made me considered lying and dishonest," said Strong. Meanwhile, Strong Ma'ruf was sentenced to 8 years in prison in the murder case of Brigadier J. Because he was considered involved in a series of murders. His involvement was by closing the door of the balcony door. This action was considered to reduce the sound of gunfire so that local residents would not hear it. With this role, Ma'ruf's strong actions were deemed to meet the elements of Article 340 in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code.