Ferdy Sambo's Subordinates Were Targeted By The Judge Because They Immediately Copied CCTV Footage When Brigadier J DIEd

Ferdy Sambo/DOK ANTARA/Sigid Kurniawan/aww

JAKARTA - Former Ferdy Sambo's subordinate, Baiquni Wibowo, was questioned by the judge because he admitted directly and only copied the CCTV footage from 16.00 WIB to 18.00 WIB on July 8. The scatter began when the judge questioned how many DVRs were copied to his laptop. Baiquni also said that only one of the three received was copied. "One of the DVRs is only one DVR with the contents of the recording?" asked the judge during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Friday, December 23. "That's right, Your Majesty," said Baiquni. "Then everything, do you move everything?" asked the judge asserted. "We don't move all of them. It's only the 8th duration of 2 hours," Baiquni said. "From what time to how many?" said the judge. "From 16 to 18," said Baiquni. Hearing this statement, the judge began to dig deeper. One of them is the order to copy the recording at a certain time. However, Baiquni emphasized that there was no order whatsoever. Thus, the judge felt awkward with the action "Did Chuck say earlier to see a copy of a certain hour?" asked the judge. "As far as we remember, we didn't exist," replied Baiquni. "Why can you choose to determine the time at 16 or approximately 2 hours?" said the judge. "When we received the DVR from Chuck we didn't understand where the DVR came from. When we opened our minds it was the appearance of the complex CCTV," Baiquni said. The odd judge immediately asked questions about the reason the witness chose the certain clock. In fact, the CCTV DVR recorded many other moments. "There's a lot that lasts at least a week, right? How come you can directly choose the 8th with a time span of 16 to 18?" said the judge. "Please allow us after we open first, the CCTV display around the complex. We immediately explained that the question requested to be seen and copied was related to the incident," Baiquni said. "Did Chuck have that order?" asked the judge again confirming that Baiquni immediately denied "Why do you immediately understand that what you want to record is related to the incident on July 8?" said the judge. "Aren't you taboo to shoot or shoot?" continued the judge. "Ready. After we found out we immediately selected the recording on the 8th of 17. We saw in general the most movements in the recordings. Because our mphon permission did not know what happened, so we took an hour and over and an hour and down," Baiquni said. Meanwhile, Baiquni Wibowo is a crown witness in the obstruction of justice case for the defendant Irfan Widyanto. This is because he also has the status of a defendant in a similar case. Meanwhile, Irfan Widyanto is the winner of Adhi Makayasa who is suspected of being involved in destroying CCTV evidence at the investigation of the death of Brigadier J. He was accused of taking and replacing CCTV DVR from around the Ferdy Sambo official residence, precisely at the Police Complex security post, Duren Tiga, South Jakarta. Thus, Irfan Widyanto is suspected of violating Article 49 in conjunction with Article 33 subsidiary Article 48 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 32 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law Number 19 of 2016 and/or the second indictment of Article 233 of the Criminal Code subsidiary Article 221 paragraph (1) to 2 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to (1) of the Criminal Code.