JAKARTA - The South Jakarta District Court stated that it did not care about the report of Judge Wahyu Iman Santoso by the legal advisor team of the defendant Strong Ma'ruf to the Judicial Commission (KY). Because, it is the right of all the defendants.
"I don't think it's an extraordinary thing, it is the right of the litigants to respond to what the judge did in his main duties and functions. Including submitting reports to KY and the Supervisory Body (Bawas)," said Public Relations of the South Jakarta District Court, Djuyamto when confirmed, Thursday, December 8.
Wahyu Iman Santoso is the presiding judge who handled the trial of the alleged murder of Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J.
The report relates to alleged violations of the code of ethics. This is because Wahyu is considered to often ask tendentious questions.
"That our client (considered, ed) lied, then there were a few times when the witness was examined that this was set and so on," said Ma'ruf's strong legal adviser, Irwan Irawan.
Meanwhile, a spokesman for the Judicial Commission, Miko Ginting, confirmed the report. He said the report was received on Wednesday, December 7, 2022,.
Currently, his party will verify the reports submitted first objectively.
"We will first verify the report, whether it meets the requirements or not to be followed up," said Miko.
For information, in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier J, Strong Ma'ruf was jointly charged with jointly assisting in planning the murder.
Thus, he is strongly suspected of violating Article 340 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary to Article 338 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to (1) of the Criminal Code.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
Tags les plus populaires
#Prabowo Subianto #Golkar #OTT KPK #élections jakarta #jeux d’argent en lignePopulaire
29 November 2024, 01:05
29 November 2024, 01:27
29 November 2024, 01:09