More Severe Sanctions, Mario Dandy, Former Son Of The Ministry Of Finance's Tax Official, Is Threatened With 12 Years In Prison

JAKARTA - The police changed the construction of the article for the suspect Mario Dandy Satriyo in the alleged abuse case against David Ozora. In the article that has just been implemented, the son of the former Director General of Taxes at the Ministry of Finance is threatened with a 12-year prison sentence.

"The maximum threat is 12 years in prison for MDS," said Director of General Criminal Investigation of Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Hengki Haryadi to reporters, Thursday, March 2.

The sentence of imprisonment for a dozen years is because Mario is suspected of being under Article 355 of the Criminal Code, paragraph 1 subsidiary to Article 354 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, which is more subsidiary to Article 352 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Then, Article 76c junto Article 80 of the child protection law.

The alleged article is heavier. Because previously Mario was only charged with Article 76C in conjunction with Article 80 of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, subsidiary to Article 351 of the Criminal Code concerning persecution.

Even with Shane Lukas. He is also suspected of having a heavier article.

"Then the suspect SL, namely 355 paragraph 1 in conjunction with 56 KUHP subsidiary 354 paragraph 1 Kuhp junto 56 kubp more subsidiary 353 paragraph 2 juncto 56 kuhp more subsidiary 351 paragraph 2 and or 76c junto 80 child protection law," said Hengki.

In the case of the persecution of David Ozora, Polda Metro Jaya decided to withdraw its handling. The reason is that there is a Sub-Directorate of Renakta who has special investigators to handle cases of violence against children and women.

Then, for the development of the handling of the case, AG's status was upgraded to become a perpetrator. This was done based on evidence and the results of the case title.