Disclosure Of Police Shooting Police Considered Many Irregularities, Democratic Legislators: Don't Assume The Public Doesn't Understand

JAKARTA - Member of the House of Representatives Commission III Didik Mukriyanto asked the Police to convey honestly the disclosure of the police shooting case that killed Brigadier J at the house of the Head of the Propam Police Division Inspector General Ferdy Sambo, including the actual chronology.

Because, a wild issue emerged in the public that the shooting incident at the house of a high-ranking National Police officer was motivated by the issue of romance.

Moreover, many people suspect that there are irregularities in the incident. For example, the mystery of the Glock-17 pistol used by Bharade E, the broken CCTV, until an aide dared to enter the room of the wife of the Head of the Propam Division.

Didik said the wild speculation arose because the police could not provide reasonable information. Therefore, according to him, it becomes a challenge for the Police to answer public suspicions.

"That's why if the public has a perception, has an opinion and then analyzes all kinds of speculation, even uncontrolled speculation, this is definitely not enough information intake, the message is not accepted by the public, it is dishonest," said Didik to VOI, Friday, July 15.

"So there is a challenge for the police to be able to provide clear, honest and correct information because the public is indeed showing that there are dramas in its alleviation," he continued.

The Democrat politician considered it natural that the public would also demand that the Police be fair in alleviating this case. Because, the one who was blamed and became the victim has died.

"Finally, the public reads why the police then carried out the press release rather slowly, then the public also suspected why the TKP was closed. Then other information emerged and even now it is growing in the public. This victim also needs justice, so why are dead people being wronged? blame it until it happens (perception) like that," he said.

According to Didik, the police must be responsible for responding to public curiosity in this case. At a minimum, he said, public information that is channeled must also be in accordance with common sense or common sense and logical thinking.

"Don't assume this public doesn't understand. Don't assume the public doesn't understand how to disclose cases. The police must be fully aware that he lives in a greenhouse, wherever he goes and does, that's where the community is present as a form of their participation," said Didik.

If the police are not transparent and unable to properly manage information and convey information to the public, said Didik, then the police agency is sad.

"Because the public impact is not only with the police, but it can be perceived that the public impact is also on the government," concluded Didik.