Crazy Rich Medan Indra Kenz Cancels Reporting Maru Nazara To Police: Want To Profit Or Lose At Binomo Each Responsibility

JAKARTA - Crazy rich Medan, Indra Kenz cancels reporting on Maru Nazara on suspicion of defamation. The reason, his arrival was only a consultation.

"Later, later, later. The report is tentative," Indra Kenz's lawyer, Wardaniman Larosa, told reporters, Monday, February 7.

Meanwhile, Indra Kenz said that even though he canceled the report, he wanted to straighten it out and clear his good name. Where, in the reporting of Maru Nazara at the Criminal Investigation Department, it has a big impact on all matters related to it.

"I want to clarify why it is like that, because right now whatever I do is considered the result of fraud, the result of gambling because my name has been tainted, even my other business is also said to be a gambling business, so this needs to be coordinated," said Indra.

Then, Indra also confirmed that he was indeed a Binomo user and affiliate. However, it does not mean that he must be responsible for the losses received by the victim.

"Well, I am a user, what should be noted is that everyone can register there, everyone can use the application, whether he makes a profit or a loss, it's the responsibility of each, but here it is as if I made a loss," said Indra. .

Crazy Rich Medan, Indra Kenz previously came from Polda Metro Jaya. Indra Kenz said his lawyer had wanted to report on Maru Nazara.

According to Wardaniman, this report will be carried out because Maru Nazara is considered to have defamed his client on YouTube social media.

"Maru Nazara, who created a YouTube account that defamed our clients, the content," said Wardaniman

The Binomo trading application and its affiliates were reported by eight people to the Criminal Investigation Unit of the National Police. The report relates to allegations of fraud.

In this report, there were eight victims who suffered losses of hundreds of millions each. If the total loss reached Rp. 2.4 billion.

Not only, the Binomo application was reported. This is because a number of affiliates as well as influencers who helped promote the trading platform were also reported. Reporting registered with number STTL/29/II/2022/BARESKRIM

"There is a public figure, the reported person is a public figure," said the reporting attorney, Finsensius Mendorfa.

In that report, the Binomo trading application was suspected of violating Article 27 paragraph 2 of the Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE) regarding online gambling, Article 28 paragraph 1 of the ITE Law regarding fake news that harms consumers, and Article 378 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 regarding fraud.

Then, Article 3, Article 5, and Article 10 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering (TPPU).