Gibran Rakabuming Raka and the Vice Presidential Debate

This is the appearance of Gibran Rakabuming Raka during the Vice Presidential Debat at the JCC. (Bambang Eros VOI)

Gibran Rakabuming Raka's appearance in the vice presidential debate became a sharp focus. The seconds he stepped off the podium created a wave of protests and debate among supporters and critics. For supporters, this action was considered a successful offensive strategy, while critics considered it unethical.

Gibran, who accompanied Prabowo Subianto, succeeded in attracting attention not only at the national level but also in the spotlight of foreign media. However, his achievements were not free from controversy, especially the controversial question to Muhaimin Iskandar and the act of leaving the podium which became the focus of discussion in the political realm and cyberspace.

Sharp criticism came from the Director of the political research and studies institute, Deep. The step away from the podium is considered detrimental to the image and ethics of a vice presidential candidate, reflecting concerns about the integrity of a leader who should be upheld.

The controversy reached a serious point when the General Election Commission (KPU) announced plans to discuss Gibran Rakabuming Raka's actions which were deemed to have violated the vice presidential debate rules. The question is not just about the momentary controversy, but also the potential impact on his electability and the integrity of the democratic process.

Amidst the pros and cons, foreign media provides diverse perspectives. Some considered Gibran's appearance as calm and effective, able to maintain emotional balance on the debate stage. Meanwhile, there is criticism of his steps which are considered to be less tactical and have the potential to harm the image of the presidential candidate he represents.

The offensive strategy implemented by Gibran Rakabuming Raka in the vice presidential debate succeeded in shaking the stage and surprising his opponents. Along with much speculation and debate regarding his appearance, a surprise emerged when the Mayor of Solo, President Jokowi's eldest son, gave an impressive performance. This controversy seemed to have dealt an additional blow to the two senior vice presidential candidates, Mahfud MD and Muhaimin Iskandar, who were not fully able to respond sharply and clearly.

Some people think that Gibran Rakabuming Raka's question is a trap. In fact, Muhaimin Iskandar managed to miss it. Gibran succeeded in reversing the opinion that many people have put it as a "vegetable starfruit". With questions regarding his controversial appearance, Gibran Rakabuming Raka entered a new chapter in his political journey. Will his appearance be able to attract first-time voters? Only time will tell. Like the presidential candidate debate, we can just treat the vice presidential debate as entertainment.