JAKARTA - The Public Prosecutor (JPU) filed a strong objection to three experts who were presented by Nadiem Makarim's legal team, namely Romli Atmasasmita, I Gede Pantja Astawa, and Ina Liem. The JPU considers their testimony to be not independent and tends to be biased.
The spotlight was on Romli Atmasasmita because of the kinship relationship. Romli is known to be the biological father of three members of Nadiem's legal advisory team who are members of the ADP Law Firm. Meanwhile, education expert Ina Liem was said by the JPU to resemble a "content creator" rather than a scientific expert because he was considered to not know the details of the case.
This case itself began with allegations of corruption in the digitization of education in 2019-2022 which caused the state a loss of IDR 2.18 trillion. Nadiem is accused of committing this act with several other parties, including Ibrahim Arief and Mulyatsyah.
Until now, the JPU regrets Nadiem's tendency to be closed and not use his right to explain the origin of his wealth transparently through the burden of proof reversal mechanism.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
